An r/AiAutomations thread shipped honest mini-reviews of agent platforms. This walks the evaluation rubric so you don't get AI-washed.
Prerequisites
- A real workflow (not a hypothetical)
- Patience to read past the marketing pages
Walkthrough
Step 1: Pin down what the platform actually IS underneath the AI marketing
Most are 1990s products + AI veneer.
Text
// Ask: 'If I removed the AI features, what's left?'
// Mindbreeze: enterprise search. Flowdash: case management. Voiceflow: chatbot builder.Step 2: Match base product to your real workflow
Not the inverse.
Text
// 'Tickets routed through human-in-the-loop' → case management. 'Agent answers questions from internal docs' → enterprise search.Step 3: Verify pricing past the marketing page
Floors and ceilings matter.
Text
// Check: free tier limits, entry tier, per-seat vs per-action, hidden add-ons.Step 4: Run a 1-week pilot on YOUR workflow, not their demo
Demos are scripted.
Text
// 'Build my actual lead-scoring rubric on this platform' beats 'watch the recorded demo'.Step 5: Compare to a composable n8n + Scavio + LLM stack
Always have a baseline.
Text
// The composable stack is your DIY baseline. If a platform isn't materially better at YOUR workflow, the platform tax isn't worth it.Step 6: Decide based on workflow fit + lock-in tolerance + total cost
Three factors.
Text
// Workflow fit, lock-in, total cost.Python Example
Python
# Cost of skipping evaluation: a 12-month enterprise contract for a platform that doesn't match your workflow.JavaScript Example
JavaScript
// Process, not code.Expected Output
JSON
An honest read on whether a given platform fits your real workflow vs whether the composable n8n+Scavio+LLM stack is the better default.