2026 Rankings

Best Search APIs for n8n Lead Scoring Workflows (2026)

Five search APIs ranked for n8n lead qualification: HTTP node compatibility, enrichment depth, cost per lead. Verified May 2026.

An r/n8n post showed a lead qualifier where the scoring prompt is 12 lines — and that is the whole product. The search API enriches each lead before scoring. Five ranked for n8n lead-scoring workflows.

Top Pick

Scavio's HTTP-friendly REST API and multi-platform enrichment give n8n lead workflows the richest context per lead at $0.005/query.

Full Ranking

#1Our Pick

Scavio

$0.005/query; $30/mo for 7K credits

Multi-platform lead enrichment in n8n

Pros
  • Simple REST API works with n8n HTTP node
  • Enrich leads across Google + Reddit + YouTube
  • Low per-query cost for lead scoring
Cons
  • No built-in lead database
#2

Apollo

$49/mo for 900 credits

B2B lead enrichment with email/phone

Pros
  • Email + phone enrichment
  • Company data
  • Chrome extension
Cons
  • $49/mo floor
  • Not a search API
#3

Hunter.io

Free 25/mo; $49/mo for 500

Email finding for scored leads

Pros
  • Domain-to-email lookup
  • Verification built-in
Cons
  • Email only
  • Low free tier
#4

Serper

Free 2,500; $50/50K

Google search enrichment at lowest cost

Pros
  • Cheapest per-query
  • n8n template available
Cons
  • Google only
  • No company/contact data
#5

Tavily

Free 1K; $30/mo for 4K

Quick web research per lead

Pros
  • Clean JSON for n8n
  • Research API for deeper context
Cons
  • Web only
  • 4K credits for $30 vs 7K for Scavio

Side-by-Side Comparison

CriteriaScavioRunner-up3rd Place
n8n HTTP node compatibleYesYes (Apollo)Yes (all)
Enrichment sourcesGoogle + Reddit + YouTubeCompany databaseEmail database
Cost per lead enrichment$0.005-0.015 (1-3 queries)$0.054 (Apollo)$0.098 (Hunter)
Best workflow shapeEnrich → LLM score → routeFind contacts → enrichFind emails → verify

Why Scavio Wins

  • Apollo provides richer B2B-specific data (company size, industry, contacts). For B2B lead scoring, Apollo's data is more directly useful than general search.
  • The n8n workflow shape that works: webhook triggers → Scavio enriches (Google + Reddit mentions) → LLM scores using 12-line prompt → routes to CRM. Total enrichment cost: $0.01/lead.
  • Hunter.io solves a different problem (finding the email). In a full pipeline, use Scavio for enrichment + scoring, then Hunter for email discovery on scored leads.
  • Serper's n8n template exists and works. For Google-only enrichment, Serper is simpler and cheaper. Add Scavio when you need Reddit/YouTube signals in the scoring.
  • The 12-line scoring prompt approach from Reddit works because the LLM does the intelligence; the API provides the data. Better data in = better scores out.

Frequently Asked Questions

Scavio is our top pick. Scavio's HTTP-friendly REST API and multi-platform enrichment give n8n lead workflows the richest context per lead at $0.005/query.

We ranked on platform coverage, pricing, developer experience, data freshness, structured response quality, and native framework integrations (LangChain, CrewAI, MCP). Each tool was evaluated against the same criteria.

Yes. Scavio offers 500 free credits per month with no credit card required. Several other tools on this list also have free tiers, noted in the rankings.

Yes, some teams combine tools for specific edge cases. But most teams consolidate on one provider to reduce integration complexity and API key sprawl. Scavio's unified platform is designed to replace multi-tool stacks.

Best Search APIs for n8n Lead Scoring Workflows (2026)

Scavio's HTTP-friendly REST API and multi-platform enrichment give n8n lead workflows the richest context per lead at $0.005/query.