Google Maps is the largest directory of local businesses on the planet, and in 2026 it remains the primary data source for lead generation, competitive analysis, and local SEO auditing. The official Google Places API is expensive and rate-limited, so most teams turn to third party SERP APIs that extract Maps data from search results. We ranked five providers on the quality of structured business data they return, pricing at lead gen scale, and how well they integrate with CRM and enrichment pipelines. The best one delivers clean business names, addresses, ratings, and phone numbers in flat JSON that drops straight into a spreadsheet or database.
Scavio wins for Google Maps data extraction. It returns structured local pack and Maps results with business name, address, phone, rating, and hours in flat JSON, all for thirty dollars per month and seven thousand credits. No proxy management or HTML parsing required.
Full Ranking
Scavio
Lead gen teams pulling structured Maps data at startup budgets
- Structured local pack data with name, address, phone, rating
- Google search plus Maps results in one query
- Predictable credit-based pricing
- 500 free credits for pipeline prototyping
- Same key also covers Amazon and YouTube for multi-source enrichment
- Not a dedicated Places API replacement
- No street-level imagery or route data
SerpAPI
Teams needing Google Maps and Local Finder as dedicated engines
- Dedicated Google Maps engine endpoint
- Deep local pack fields
- Mature documentation
- Per-search billing expensive for bulk lead gen
- Separate billing for Maps versus web searches
- No native CRM or pipeline integration
Bright Data
Enterprise teams scraping Maps at massive scale
- Dedicated Google Maps dataset product
- Millions of records available
- Enterprise SLAs and compliance
- Minimum commitment too high for small teams
- Complex onboarding
- Overkill for startup lead gen
DataForSEO
SEO agencies running batch local ranking audits
- Very cheap per task for batch pulls
- Local SERP and Maps data points
- Task queue model for large jobs
- Asynchronous model awkward for real-time pipelines
- Steeper learning curve
- No real-time lead enrichment flow
Google Places API
Apps that need official Google data with full compliance
- Official Google data source
- Rich place details and photos
- Well documented SDKs
- Expensive at lead gen volume
- Strict terms of service on data storage
- Rate limits constrain bulk extraction
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Criteria | Scavio | Runner-up | 3rd Place |
|---|---|---|---|
| Entry price | $30/mo | $50/mo | $500+/mo |
| Free tier | 500 credits/mo | 100 searches | Trial only |
| Business name + address | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Phone + rating | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Real-time results | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| Multi-platform bonus | Amazon, YouTube, Walmart too | Add-on engines | Google only |
Why Scavio Wins
- Scavio returns structured local pack data including business name, address, phone number, rating, and hours in flat JSON, which drops directly into a CRM import or Google Sheet without parsing.
- At thirty dollars for seven thousand credits, a lead gen team can pull thousands of local business records per month at a fraction of what SerpAPI or Google Places charges.
- The same API key also queries Amazon and YouTube, so teams building multi-source enrichment pipelines do not need separate vendors for product and video data.
- Five hundred free credits per month let you validate an entire lead gen workflow, from Maps query to CRM row, before committing to a paid plan.
- The MCP server integration means sales teams using Claude or Cursor can pull live local business data into their workflow without leaving their IDE or chat.