B2B directory scraping in 2026 powers lead generation pipelines across industries. Teams use tools like Firecrawl and Serper inside n8n workflows to extract business listings from Google Maps, industry directories, and professional networks. The challenge is reliability, because directory layouts change frequently, breaking scrapers and corrupting data. We ranked five approaches on data quality, extraction reliability, n8n workflow compatibility, and cost per extracted business record.
Scavio provides the most reliable B2B directory data through structured search rather than fragile scraping. Google Maps business listings come back as clean JSON with names, addresses, phones, and websites, eliminating the parsing failures that plague directory scrapers.
Full Ranking
Scavio
Teams needing reliable B2B data without scraping fragility
- Structured Google Maps business data with names, addresses, phones, websites
- No parsing failures from directory layout changes
- Half a cent per business record extraction
- Works via HTTP Request node in n8n
- 250 free credits monthly for pipeline testing
- Limited to businesses that appear in Google Maps search
- No scraping of niche industry directories
Firecrawl
Teams that must scrape specific directory websites
- Can scrape any directory website
- Returns structured markdown
- n8n community node available
- Directory scraping breaks when sites change layout
- Custom parsing rules needed per directory
- Slower and less reliable than API approaches
SerpAPI
n8n users with community node who want Google Maps data
- Google Maps search with structured results
- Community n8n node
- Reliable data quality
- Three times more expensive per record than Scavio
- Unused searches expire
- n8n node may lag API updates
Serper.dev
High-volume Google search for directory alternatives
- Very cheap for Google search data
- Fast responses
- Generous free tier
- Google Maps data less structured
- No business contact extraction
- Google only
Apollo.io
Teams that want pre-scraped B2B contact data
- 275 million contacts already extracted
- Emails and phone numbers included
- No scraping needed
- Per-user pricing is expensive for data access
- Limited to contacts in their database
- Not a directory scraping tool, a database
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Criteria | Scavio | Runner-up | 3rd Place |
|---|---|---|---|
| Data reliability | API-guaranteed schema | Scraping, fragile | API, reliable |
| Cost per record | $0.005 | Varies | $0.015 |
| Google Maps data | Structured fields | Via scraping | Structured |
| n8n compatibility | HTTP Request node | Community node | Community node |
| Custom directory scraping | No | Yes | No |
| Free tier | 250/mo | 500 one-time | 100 searches |
Why Scavio Wins
- Structured Google Maps business data eliminates the parsing failures and maintenance burden that come with scraping directory websites directly.
- At half a cent per business record, extracting two thousand leads from Google Maps costs ten dollars, compared to thirty on SerpAPI.
- Flat JSON fields map directly to n8n workflow node outputs without custom Function nodes for data transformation.
- The same API key lets pipelines enrich B2B directory data with Google search intelligence, Amazon product lookups, and YouTube content for the same prospect.
- The 250 free monthly credits let teams validate data quality against their target directories before committing to a paid plan.